Describe the situation
Capture the allegation, issue or operational need. High-risk facts can require professional review.
WageRun Shield
Source-linked steps, worker response and an append-only chronology—without automating the employment decision.
A process, not a verdict
Shield is designed around the September 2025 Code of Practice: Dismissal, current sources and the employer’s duty to make the actual decision.
Capture the allegation, issue or operational need. High-risk facts can require professional review.
Show the source and required process shape. A qualified content approval remains a production gate.
Provide a channel to respond or acknowledge receipt without forcing agreement.
A named person makes findings and chooses the outcome. The system does not select a sanction.
Notices, responses, evidence, review and next steps remain linked without erasing earlier material.
Professional boundary
Advice Review is separately priced and separately assigned. It is not hidden inside low-cost software and does not create an outcome promise.
What “ready” means here
The workflow version points to its source and effective date. A source change triggers review.
Notice, opportunity to respond, actual response and delivery evidence remain distinct.
An export can show the chronology and missing material. It cannot prove that every fact or decision was fair.
Shield workflow mechanics exist locally. Qualified current-Code approval, real professional operation and production use remain launch gates.
See the dated source desk